Re: [patch, fortran] PR38573 Missing markers for translation

2017-04-01 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 04/01/2017 06:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: --- snip --- > > So, the above means the strings are translated twice (say if in theory > you translate from english to language X and that translation, when > used as english, translated again to language X means something different, > you get wrong me

Re: [patch, fortran] PR38573 Missing markers for translation

2017-04-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 03:28:31PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > > Minor patch to had translation marks. > > > > Regression tested. OK for Trunk? > > OK. > > I would think that adding _(...) to a string needing > translations is both obvious and simple; I think we can > pre-approv

Re: [patch, fortran] PR38573 Missing markers for translation

2017-04-01 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Jerry, Minor patch to had translation marks. Regression tested. OK for Trunk? OK. I would think that adding _(...) to a string needing translations is both obvious and simple; I think we can pre-approve such patches. Regards Thomas

[patch, fortran] PR38573 Missing markers for translation

2017-03-30 Thread Jerry DeLisle
Minor patch to had translation marks. Regression tested. OK for Trunk? Jerry 2017-03-30 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/38573 * intrinsic.c (gfc_check_intrinsic_standard): Adjust diagnostics. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c index 2f60fe8..2e3b250 10064