Am 09.12.19 um 17:30 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Maybe -finline-repack would be a better name? -finline-internal-pack?
Steve made an excellent suggestion: -finline-arg-packing .
So, OK with that change?
Regards
Thomas
Hi Richard,
Just as a suggestion, maybe we'd want to extend this
to other intrinsics in future so a -fno-inline-intrinsic=pack[,...]
is more future proof? (I'd inline all intrinsics by default thus
only provide the negative form). You can avoid the extra
option parsing complexity by only litera
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:53 PM Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> the attached patch introduces a new option, -finline-pack.
>
> Since the fix for PR88821, we now do inline packing of
> arguments (if required) via the scalarizer, instead of
> using _gfortran_internal_[un]pack when optimizin
Hello world,
the attached patch introduces a new option, -finline-pack.
Since the fix for PR88821, we now do inline packing of
arguments (if required) via the scalarizer, instead of
using _gfortran_internal_[un]pack when optimizing, but
not when optimizing for size.
This introduces (really) lar
