Hi Steve,
OK for trunk/9/8?
OK for all three.
Thanks, committed to trunk as r277760.
I'll be AFK for a few days, so I will have to wait before
committing this to gcc-9. Given the convoluted history of
this bug, this might not be a bad thing.
> It is, as you have indicated, troublesome that
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 10:38:32AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> the attached patch fixes an 8/9/10 regression where, to fix PR 84487
> by not putting the initializers and vtabs into the read-only section
> (for reasons of size, which could grow enormously) led to a regression
> on POWER9 and ot
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes an 8/9/10 regression where, to fix PR 84487
by not putting the initializers and vtabs into the read-only section
(for reasons of size, which could grow enormously) led to a regression
on POWER9 and other non-x86 architectures, where the initializer was
someti
