Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 69154, inline matmul with WHERE

Hi Thomas, Thanks for changing the testcase to demonstrate that in_where does not get left as true. OK for trunk. That's one regression down! Thanks for the patch Paul On 10 January 2016 at 13:38, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 10.01.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Thomas Koenig: >> >> Hello world, >> >> t

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 69154, inline matmul with WHERE

Am 10.01.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Thomas Koenig: Hello world, the attached patch fixes the regression. Before this, front-end optimization would have tried to put a DO loop inside a WHERE construct, leading to an ICE. The updated test case demonstrates that matmul inlining is done even after not

[patch, fortran] Fix PR 69154, inline matmul with WHERE

Hello world, the attached patch fixes the regression. Before this, front-end optimization would have tried to put a DO loop inside a WHERE construct, leading to an ICE. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? Thomas 2016-01-10 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/69154 * frontend-pas