On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> + && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "Transformational function
> %qs "
> + "invalid as initialization expression is
> at %L",
> + name, &expr->where))
OK after you fi
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes a 5/6/7 regression where we accept
code that is invalid for F95. Regression-tested.
OK for trunk?
(For some reason attaching the file doesn't work, and I don't want to
reboot my computer or log out just now because of some long-running
calculation. Therefo
