Hi Paul,
It looks fine to me. OK for trunk.
Thanks, committed.
Paul
PS What about PR34640 ?
Your patch is OK if you bump the library version.
Regards
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
It looks fine to me. OK for trunk.
Thanks
Paul
PS What about PR34640 ?
On 9 August 2017 at 20:44, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 02.08.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
>>
>> the attached patch is a bit smaller than it looks, because most of
>> it is due to reformatting a large
Am 02.08.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
the attached patch is a bit smaller than it looks, because most of
it is due to reformatting a large comment. It is rather simple -
checking for an incorrectly placed BIND(C) variable was sometimes not
done because the test was mixed in with other te
Hello world,
the attached patch is a bit smaller than it looks, because most of
it is due to reformatting a large comment. It is rather simple -
checking for an incorrectly placed BIND(C) variable was sometimes not
done because the test was mixed in with other tests where implicitly
typed variab