Hi Tobias,
> Thomas Koenig wrote:
>> This patch takes the approach that any array bound which
>> contains a dummy variable which is not INTENT(IN) may be
>> changed by the user, and that we cannot be assured that
>> it will not be changed.
>
> How about sym->attr.flavor == FL_PARAMETER? I am not
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Koenig wrote:
> This patch takes the approach that any array bound which
> contains a dummy variable which is not INTENT(IN) may be
> changed by the user, and that we cannot be assured that
> it will not be changed.
How about sym->attr.flavor == FL_PARAMETER? I am not sure
whet
Hello world,
this patch fixes a longstanding regression where an upper array
bound and the upper bound of an array section compared equal
(using gfc_dep_compare_expr), but they weren't because
the value of the upper bound had been changed in the
meantime. This led to gfc_full_array_ref_p to erron
