Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 48066

2011-03-12 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 03/12/2011 03:04 PM, Mikael Morin wrote: On Saturday 12 March 2011 23:40:32 Thomas Koenig wrote: Hi Jerry, On 03/12/2011 02:09 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hello world, the attached patch fixes PR 48066, a regression introduced way back when. It is pretty self-explanatory. Regression-tested.

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 48066

2011-03-12 Thread Thomas Koenig
Am 13.03.2011 00:04, schrieb Mikael Morin: On Saturday 12 March 2011 23:40:32 Thomas Koenig wrote: There was a typo in the PR number (both in the testcases and in the changelogs) Corrected. Thanks! Thomas

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 48066

2011-03-12 Thread Mikael Morin
On Saturday 12 March 2011 23:40:32 Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > > On 03/12/2011 02:09 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > >> Hello world, > >> > >> the attached patch fixes PR 48066, a regression introduced way back > >> when. It is > >> pretty self-explanatory. Regression-tested. > >> > >> OK fo

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 48066

2011-03-12 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Jerry, On 03/12/2011 02:09 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hello world, the attached patch fixes PR 48066, a regression introduced way back when. It is pretty self-explanatory. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? OK and thanks for patch! Übertrage Daten .

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 48066

2011-03-12 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 03/12/2011 02:09 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hello world, the attached patch fixes PR 48066, a regression introduced way back when. It is pretty self-explanatory. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? OK and thanks for patch! Jerry

[patch, fortran] Fix PR 48066

2011-03-12 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, the attached patch fixes PR 48066, a regression introduced way back when. It is pretty self-explanatory. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? Also OK for a 4.5 backport? Thomas 2011-03-12 Thomas Koenig PR libfortran/40866 * m4/ifunction.m4: If return