Dear Paul,
Following some comments from Thomas, the attached is the version that
I wound up with. Tell us which one you prefer and Thomas and I will
do the honours.
Bootstrapped and regtested on FC9/x86_64 - OK for trunk and 4.6?
Your patch is does the job and is less intrusive than mine -
Dear All,
>
> I have posted a simpler alternative on the PR that uses your
> suggestion that forward and backward dependences need to to be
> recorded to get this right.
>
> I believe that it's OK but have only now had the opportunity to put it
> on to regtest.
>
Following some comments from Thoma
Dear Thomas,
I am sorry for the long silence on this PR. I have been up to my
eyeballs in daytime work.
I have posted a simpler alternative on the PR that uses your
suggestion that forward and backward dependences need to to be
recorded to get this right.
I believe that it's OK but have only no
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes PR 48955, a wrong-code regression for 4.6 and
4.7, including the test case from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00093.html . It follows the
outline from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955#c7 .
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
