Hi Tobias,
Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested
implementing the function
bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *);
or something similarly named.
If you will work on it, please tell me -
Sounds interesting. I'll give it a shot.
Thomas
Le 28/03/2013 18:48, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
> Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested
> implementing the function
>bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *);
> or something similarly named.
>
> It should return true, if the expression is known to be noncontiguous
Thomas Koenig wrote:
below is a patch which improves dependency checking for array
assignments and calculation of string lengths.
Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested
implementing the function
bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *);
or something similar
I wrote:
Ping**2?
I'd like to get these patches committed, if possible, to clear up my
trees a little bit :-)
Thomas
*ping*
Slightly updated patch below, with a better test case as suggested
by Dominique.
OK for trunk?
2013-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45159
*ping*
Slightly updated patch below, with a better test case as suggested
by Dominique.
OK for trunk?
2013-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45159
* gfortran.h (gfc_dep_difference): Add prototype.
* dependency.c (discard_nops): New function.
(gfc_dep_differenc
Thomas,
Your test gfortran.dg/dependency_40.f90 does not have depedencies and
does not create a temporary (assuming that "-Warray-temporaries" does
not miss any) with/without your patch and with gcc4.6, 4.7, and 4.8.
4.5 gives a warning. I have tried a few variants attempting to create
a temporar
Hello world,
below is a patch which improves dependency checking for array
assignments and calculation of string lengths.
The new function gfc_dep_difference is used for both. This allows
us to detect, for example, that the difference between the lower
indices of
a(n:m:2) = a(n+1:m+1:2)
i
