Hi!
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:43:49 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:38:06PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 08/04/16 12:35, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > I've looked at the patch, it looks good to me.
> >
> > I think it can be committed as obvious.
>
> The patch is ok for tr
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:38:06PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 08/04/16 12:35, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> I've looked at the patch, it looks good to me.
>
> I think it can be committed as obvious.
The patch is ok for trunk.
> >>commit df7d7943ae64f6df74d360e71f7c495c78647fda
> >>Author: Thomas
On 08/04/16 12:35, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
Ping.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:24:48 +0100, I wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:36:25 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 14/07/15 06:54, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/13/2015 04:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 07/07/15 09:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
currently, we have
Hi!
Ping.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:24:48 +0100, I wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:36:25 +0200, Tom de Vries
> wrote:
> > On 14/07/15 06:54, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On 07/13/2015 04:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > >> On 07/07/15 09:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > >>> currently, we have these spec strings
Hi!
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:36:25 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 14/07/15 06:54, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 07/13/2015 04:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >> On 07/07/15 09:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>> currently, we have these spec strings in gcc/gcc.c involving
> >>> ftree-parallelize-loops:
> >>> ...
On 14/07/15 06:54, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/13/2015 04:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 07/07/15 09:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
currently, we have these spec strings in gcc/gcc.c involving
ftree-parallelize-loops:
...
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:%:include(libgomp.spec)%(link_gomp)}
On 07/13/2015 04:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 07/07/15 09:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
currently, we have these spec strings in gcc/gcc.c involving
ftree-parallelize-loops:
...
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:%:include(libgomp.spec)%(link_gomp)}
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-paralleli
On 07/07/15 09:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
currently, we have these spec strings in gcc/gcc.c involving
ftree-parallelize-loops:
...
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:%:include(libgomp.spec)%(link_gomp)}
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:-pthread}"
...
Actually, ftree-par
Hi,
currently, we have these spec strings in gcc/gcc.c involving
ftree-parallelize-loops:
...
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:%:include(libgomp.spec)%(link_gomp)}
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:-pthread}"
...
Actually, ftree-parallelize-loops={0,1} means that no para
