Hi Sandra,
> On 12/11/2016 01:28 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Sandra,
>>
>>> PR 16519 notes that -pthread has only ever been documented as an RS6000 and
>>> Solaris 2 option. In fact it's supported by most/all(?) POSIX-flavored
>>> targets, including GNU/Linux, BSD variants, Darwin, etc. It's pro
On 12/11/2016 01:28 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Sandra,
PR 16519 notes that -pthread has only ever been documented as an RS6000 and
Solaris 2 option. In fact it's supported by most/all(?) POSIX-flavored
targets, including GNU/Linux, BSD variants, Darwin, etc. It's probably best
to document it as
Hi Sandra,
> PR 16519 notes that -pthread has only ever been documented as an RS6000 and
> Solaris 2 option. In fact it's supported by most/all(?) POSIX-flavored
> targets, including GNU/Linux, BSD variants, Darwin, etc. It's probably best
> to document it as a generic option, with the expectatio
PR 16519 notes that -pthread has only ever been documented as an RS6000
and Solaris 2 option. In fact it's supported by most/all(?)
POSIX-flavored targets, including GNU/Linux, BSD variants, Darwin, etc.
It's probably best to document it as a generic option, with the
expectation that GCC supp
