Re: [patch, ARM] require 64-bit hw-int for all arm targets

2013-08-07 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 07/08/13 01:25, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> Most arm target configs now require a 64-bit HW-int. Unfortunately a few of >> the older, less commonly used config targets do not. The code in arm.c now >> pretty much requires that a 64-bit HW-int is

Re: [patch, ARM] require 64-bit hw-int for all arm targets

2013-08-06 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > Most arm target configs now require a 64-bit HW-int. Unfortunately a few of > the older, less commonly used config targets do not. The code in arm.c now > pretty much requires that a 64-bit HW-int is used, especially for > vectorization to work. >

[patch, ARM] require 64-bit hw-int for all arm targets

2013-07-30 Thread Richard Earnshaw
Most arm target configs now require a 64-bit HW-int. Unfortunately a few of the older, less commonly used config targets do not. The code in arm.c now pretty much requires that a 64-bit HW-int is used, especially for vectorization to work. This patch makes 64-bit HW-int the default for all a