On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 04:53:24PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Updated accordingly, and committed as attached.
Note, current trunk allows one to define expanders that take mode as the
first argument, so you could
(define_insn "@set_softstack_"
[(unspec [(match_operand:P 0 "nvptx_register_operan
quot;set_softstack_insn"
>> - [(unspec [(match_operand 0 "nvptx_register_operand" "R")]
>> +(define_insn "set_softstack_insn_"
>> + [(unspec [(match_operand:P 0 "nvptx_register_operand" "R")]
>
> A purely cosmetic issue, b
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> any comments?
A couple suggestions (see below), but no serious concerns from my side.
> --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,17 @@ enum nvptx_data_area
>DATA_AREA_MAX
> };
>
> +rtx
>
Hi Alexander,
any comments?
Thanks,
- Tom
[nvptx] Fix missing mode warnings in nvptx.md, omp part
Fix these warnings:
...
gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md:1074:1: warning: operand 0 missing mode?
gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md:1240:1: warning: operand 0 missing mode?
gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md:1240:1
