Re: [m68k, sparc] Fix atomic_test_and_set

2012-02-28 Thread Oleg Endo
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 09:29 +1100, Richard Henderson wrote: > Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++ > patch was approved by Benjamin. > > All of the patches tested on sparc64-linux, and sanity checked > on x86_64-linux. I've cross-compiled for m68k-linux, but I've > only

Re: [m68k, sparc] Fix atomic_test_and_set

2012-01-26 Thread David Miller
From: Richard Henderson Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:41:10 +1100 > On 01/27/2012 09:34 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Richard Henderson >> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 +1100 >> >>> Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++ >>> patch was approved by Benjamin. >>> >>> All o

Re: [m68k, sparc] Fix atomic_test_and_set

2012-01-26 Thread Richard Henderson
On 01/27/2012 09:34 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Richard Henderson > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 +1100 > >> Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++ >> patch was approved by Benjamin. >> >> All of the patches tested on sparc64-linux, and sanity checked >> on x86_64-li

Re: [m68k, sparc] Fix atomic_test_and_set

2012-01-26 Thread David Miller
From: Richard Henderson Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 +1100 > Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++ > patch was approved by Benjamin. > > All of the patches tested on sparc64-linux, and sanity checked > on x86_64-linux. I've cross-compiled for m68k-linux, but I've > o

[m68k, sparc] Fix atomic_test_and_set

2012-01-26 Thread Richard Henderson
Two of the patches have been posted here before; the libstdc++ patch was approved by Benjamin. All of the patches tested on sparc64-linux, and sanity checked on x86_64-linux. I've cross-compiled for m68k-linux, but I've only been able to visually sanity check the code in libstdc++. Committed. H