On 06/26/2018 03:31 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Which assert are you referring to?
Hm, I think I may have been confused by the unsigned arithmetic check in:
if (start_location <= set->highest_line
|| start_location > LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION (set))
/* We ran out of macro map spa
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:28 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've been wandering around the line-map machinery on the modules
> branch.
> One thing I noticed was the padding of the line_map type hierarchy
> was
> unfortunate. That made me sad. This patch fixes that.
>
> Rather than keep the th
I've been wandering around the line-map machinery on the modules branch.
One thing I noticed was the padding of the line_map type hierarchy was
unfortunate. That made me sad. This patch fixes that.
Rather than keep the the reason field in line_map, I move it to
line_map_ordinary. That allo
