On 14/05/17 09:19 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch adds 2 simple __glibcxx_assert in optional that match the
precondition in the comment above. I am not sure if there was a reason
the author wrote that comment instead of the assertion, but constexpr
use still seems to work.
Yes,
Hello,
this patch adds 2 simple __glibcxx_assert in optional that match the
precondition in the comment above. I am not sure if there was a reason the
author wrote that comment instead of the assertion, but constexpr use
still seems to work.
I hesitated about having the assertion in operator
