On 29/07/15 01:56 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
If 4.9 is `stable` and expected to be experimetal, which by my
definition should only include important changes, we may leave it as
is?
Yes, let's not change the 4.9 version.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The 4.9 branch is the oldest one we still support, so should be very
> stable now, although C++11 support in 4.9 is still labelled
> experimental, and this only changes C++11 code. How important is it to
> fix?
Um... I'd say medium importa
On 28/07/15 21:44 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:40 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
Done by s/_M_add_collating_element/_M_add_collate_element/.
Great, thanks. OK for trunk and gcc-5-branch.
Committed. Is there no need for gcc-4_9-bran
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 27/07/15 19:40 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
>>
>> Done by s/_M_add_collating_element/_M_add_collate_element/.
>
>
> Great, thanks. OK for trunk and gcc-5-branch.
Committed. Is there no need for gcc-4_9-branch? What's the general
policy for ba
On 27/07/15 19:40 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
Done by s/_M_add_collating_element/_M_add_collate_element/.
Great, thanks. OK for trunk and gcc-5-branch.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/07/15 05:20 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
>>
>> @@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> - void
>> + _StringT
>> _M_add_collating_element(const _StringT& __s)
>> {
>> auto
On 26/07/15 05:20 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
@@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
#endif
}
- void
+ _StringT
_M_add_collating_element(const _StringT& __s)
{
auto __st = _M_traits.lookup_collatename(__s.data(),
Changing this return type is an ABI
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Tim Shen wrote:
> Kinda important, since "[a-z0-9-]" may be a common case.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested.
Actual patch...
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
commit e0e6c2e3b722e1453d29ad3a56d0de80046453b0
Author: Tim Shen
Date: Sun Jul 26 04:37:45 2015 -0700
PR libs
Kinda important, since "[a-z0-9-]" may be a common case.
Bootstrapped and tested.
Guess it can also be backported to 5, or even 4.9?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
