>> In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global
>> reviewer approve this rather simple patch, please?
>
> OK
Committed as rev. 226748. Thanks.
FX
Sorry - I missed the "global"
Paul
On 9 August 2015 at 09:08, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Dear FX,
>
> I looks OK to me - as you say, it's rather simple. Good for trunk.
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Paul
>
> On 9 August 2015 at 08:27, FX wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> In the apparent absence of the libq
On August 9, 2015 8:27:09 AM GMT+02:00, FX wrote:
>ping
>
>In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global
>reviewer approve this rather simple patch, please?
OK
Richard
>
>
>> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from
>glibc.
>> It is made nec
Dear FX,
I looks OK to me - as you say, it's rather simple. Good for trunk.
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On 9 August 2015 at 08:27, FX wrote:
> ping
>
> In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global
> reviewer approve this rather simple patch, please?
>
>
>
>> The attach
ping
In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global reviewer
approve this rather simple patch, please?
> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from glibc.
> It is made necessary by an upcoming patch for gfortran, adding full support
> for th
> With the updated patch the test gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 compiles, but
> fails at run time due to the lines
>
> if (.not. ieee_support_underflow_control(x1)) call abort
>
> and
>
> if (.not. ieee_support_underflow_control(x2)) call abort
>
> IIRC Uros said that underflow id not support
> Le 5 août 2015 à 15:11, FX a écrit :
>
>> AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation
>> of math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am
>> missing?
>
> Maybe you didn’t regenerate the Makefile.in?
Indeed I did not!-(I have never succ
> AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation
> of math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am
> missing?
Maybe you didn’t regenerate the Makefile.in?
The patch was sent without this regenerated file, as is (as I understand) the
custom on
> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from glibc.
AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation of
math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am missing?
TIA
Dominique
The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from glibc.
It is made necessary by an upcoming patch for gfortran, adding full support for
the IEEE modules on __float128, and requires logbq().
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin14.
OK to commit to trunk?
FX
log
10 matches
Mail list logo
