David Edelsohn wrote:
I have not tried this patch, but will it actually fix it? The error
is real_kinds(3) is outside the array bounds. Your patch fixes
addresses a runtime problem, not a compile-time problem, if I
understand correctly.
Yes, I realized it myself - after a hint by Dominique. Th
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:03:10PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> +2012-12-04 Tobias Burnus
> +
> + * gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90: Fix a condition,
> + which wrongly required ordered/lazy evaluation.
> +
> 2012-12-04 Marcus Shawcroft
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/121127.c: New test.
> I
Tobias,
I have not tried this patch, but will it actually fix it? The error
is real_kinds(3) is outside the array bounds. Your patch fixes
addresses a runtime problem, not a compile-time problem, if I
understand correctly.
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90:17.47:
if (
David Edelsohn:
The quad_3.f90 testcase fails on AIX, which does not have quad math enabled. I
do not understand how the following line can be correct.
Well, obviously, it is not correct - otherwise you wouldn't see a
failure :-)
Corrected by the attached patch (Rev. 194155).
Sorry for the
Tobias,
The quad_3.f90 testcase fails on AIX, which does not have quad math enabled.
I do not understand how the following line can be correct. Fortran
does not have early exit and the line is evaluated at compile time, so
real_kinds(3) is not valid because real_kinds array does not have that
man
Somehow that got lot when updating the file. I think, we really need a
proper test suite - the current quad_{1,2,3}.f90 are a first step, but
rather incomplete.
Committed as Rev. 194100 after build+regtesting.
Tobias
Index: libquadmath/ChangeLog
