On 11/03/2014 05:22 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> 2014-10-22 Rainer Orth
>
> libobjc:
> * thr.c (_XOPEN_SOURCE): Define as 600.
>
> libiberty:
> * sigsetmask.c (_POSIX_SOURCE): Remove.
>
> libgomp:
> * config/posix/lock.c (_XOPEN_SOURCE) Define as 600.
Ok.
r~
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 10/24/2014 01:56 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> And even with the _XOPEN_SOURCE business out of the way, there's still
>> the question what to do about _POSIX_SOURCE in libiberty/sigsetmask.c.
>> Given that it was introduced almost 20 years ago, it may well be
>> unneces
On 10/24/2014 01:56 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> And even with the _XOPEN_SOURCE business out of the way, there's still
> the question what to do about _POSIX_SOURCE in libiberty/sigsetmask.c.
> Given that it was introduced almost 20 years ago, it may well be
> unnecessary for the systems we still care
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 10/22/2014 04:43 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> The gnu11 patch broke Solaris 10 and 11 bootstrap:
>> has
>>
>> /*
>> * It is invalid to compile an XPG3, XPG4, XPG4v2, or XPG5 application
>> * using c99. The same is true for POSIX.1-1990, POSIX.2-1992, POSIX.1b,
>>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> The gnu11 patch broke Solaris 10 and 11 bootstrap:
> has
>
> /*
> * It is invalid to compile an XPG3, XPG4, XPG4v2, or XPG5 application
> * using c99. The same is true for POSIX.1-1990, POSIX.2-1992, POSIX.1b,
> * and POSIX.1c applications
On 10/22/2014 04:43 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> The gnu11 patch broke Solaris 10 and 11 bootstrap:
> has
>
> /*
> * It is invalid to compile an XPG3, XPG4, XPG4v2, or XPG5 application
> * using c99. The same is true for POSIX.1-1990, POSIX.2-1992, POSIX.1b,
> * and POSIX.1c applications. Likewis
The gnu11 patch broke Solaris 10 and 11 bootstrap:
has
/*
* It is invalid to compile an XPG3, XPG4, XPG4v2, or XPG5 application
* using c99. The same is true for POSIX.1-1990, POSIX.2-1992, POSIX.1b,
* and POSIX.1c applications. Likewise, it is invalid to compile an XPG6
* or a POSIX.1-2001
