Hi Tobias,
> Rainer Orth wrote:
>> how should we proceed with this patch now, given the questions above?
>> Install as is, although it doesn't seem really beneficial, or drop it?
>
> I would install it. Actually, did you get a libquadmath dependence on
> Solaris or not?
I do, both with Solaris ld
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Orth wrote:
how should we proceed with this patch now, given the questions above?
Install as is, although it doesn't seem really beneficial, or drop it?
I would install it. Actually, did you get a libquadmath dependence on
Solaris or not?
On Linux - or to be more precise:
Hi Tobias,
>> Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> As requested by Tobias, this patch supports -z ignore with Solaris ld
>>> instead of GNU ld's --as-needed.
>>
>> For reference, my request was motivated by
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00425.html
>> (The patch has been approved, but it does n
Hi Tobias,
> Rainer Orth wrote:
>> As requested by Tobias, this patch supports -z ignore with Solaris ld
>> instead of GNU ld's --as-needed.
>
> For reference, my request was motivated by
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00425.html
> (The patch has been approved, but it does not seem
Rainer Orth wrote:
As requested by Tobias, this patch supports -z ignore with Solaris ld
instead of GNU ld's --as-needed.
For reference, my request was motivated by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00425.html
(The patch has been approved, but it does not seem to be in, yet.)
i38
As requested by Tobias, this patch supports -z ignore with Solaris ld
instead of GNU ld's --as-needed.
i386-pc-solaris2.10 and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu bootstraps are still
running. In both cases, the correct options were detected and written
into libgfortran.spec. AFAICS the -static-libgfortran
