Re: [libatomic PATCH] Fix libatomic behavior for big endian toolchain

Hi, Joseph I have been modify the patch as your suggestion use # if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ in architecture-independent files Is it ok for trunk ? And I don't have svn write access Could you help me to commit this patch? Shiva 2014-10-17 23:41 GMT+08:00 Joseph S. Myers : > Chang

Re: [libatomic PATCH] Fix libatomic behavior for big endian toolchain

Changes to architecture-independent files must use architecture-independent conditionals, so __BYTE_ORDER__ not __ARMEB__. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

[libatomic PATCH] Fix libatomic behavior for big endian toolchain

Hi, I noticed that libatomic implementation for builtin function parameter smaller than word. It would shift the parameter value to word and then store word. However, the shift amount for big endian would be wrong. This patch fix libatomic builtin function behavior for big endian toolchain. Is it