Re: [jit] Add a test of using very long names

2014-09-28 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 26, 2014, at 12:31 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 11:45 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2014, at 8:14 AM, David Malcolm >> wrote: >>> * jit.dg/test-long-names.c: New test case. >> >>> +/* 65KB */ >>> +#define NAME_LENGTH (65 * 1024) >> >> 65K was a tiny name

Re: [jit] Add a test of using very long names

2014-09-26 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 11:45 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 26, 2014, at 8:14 AM, David Malcolm > wrote: > > * jit.dg/test-long-names.c: New test case. > > > +/* 65KB */ > > +#define NAME_LENGTH (65 * 1024) > > 65K was a tiny name back in 1999, 16M was a large name then. Today, > 16M is t

Re: [jit] Add a test of using very long names

2014-09-26 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 26, 2014, at 8:14 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > * jit.dg/test-long-names.c: New test case. > +/* 65KB */ > +#define NAME_LENGTH (65 * 1024) 65K was a tiny name back in 1999, 16M was a large name then. Today, 16M is tiny enough. And yeah, this was a customer bug report, just normal C

[jit] Add a test of using very long names

2014-09-26 Thread David Malcolm
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.jit: * jit.dg/test-long-names.c: New test case. * jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h: Add test-long-names.c * jit.dg/test-combination.c (create_code): Likewise. (verify_code): Likewise. * jit.dg/test-thre