On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Er, I am sorry, I don't know what happened, but when testing the backport to
> 4.9 I got an obvious failure in the testsuite, which I am sure should also
> happen on trunk, but somehow I didn't see it (I am almost sure I tested the
> right bra
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
as reported in PR 61503, there seems to be a typo in the shrd pattern. I
think it is quite unlikely to cause any problem, because the pattern is 1
instruction too long for combine to recognize it (by
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> as reported in PR 61503, there seems to be a typo in the shrd pattern. I
> think it is quite unlikely to cause any problem, because the pattern is 1
> instruction too long for combine to recognize it (by the way, if someone has
> suggestions
Hello,
as reported in PR 61503, there seems to be a typo in the shrd pattern. I
think it is quite unlikely to cause any problem, because the pattern is 1
instruction too long for combine to recognize it (by the way, if someone
has suggestions for PR 55583...). But it is still better to fix it.
