Hello!
> glibc marks fegetround as a pure function. On x86, people tend to use
> _MM_GET_ROUNDING_MODE instead, which could benefit from the same. I think it
> is safe, but
> a second opinion would be welcome. I could have handled just this builtin,
> but it seemed better to
> provide def_builti
Ping.
On Sat, 3 Jun 2017, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I don't think Richard's "sounds good" was meant as "ok to commit". Does an
x86 maintainer want to approve or criticize the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg02009.html
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri
Hello,
I don't think Richard's "sounds good" was meant as "ok to commit". Does an
x86 maintainer want to approve or criticize the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg02009.html
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> glibc marks fegetround as a pure function. On x86, people tend to use
> _MM_GET_ROUNDING_MODE instead, which could benefit from the same. I think it
> is safe, but a second opinion would be welcome.
Sounds good. The important part
Hello,
glibc marks fegetround as a pure function. On x86, people tend to use
_MM_GET_ROUNDING_MODE instead, which could benefit from the same. I think
it is safe, but a second opinion would be welcome.
I could have handled just this builtin, but it seemed better to provide
def_builtin_pure (
