Hi!
PDP endian is
gcc_assert (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN);
gcc_assert (WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN);
and 16-bit words, thus within uint16_t it is little endian, and the
16-bit words are ordered in larger units in big endian order.
> +#else
> + val = ((val & 0xff00ff00) >> 8) | ((val & 0xff00ff) << 8);
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:58:51AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:49:12AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > bootstrapping on i686-linux revealed the need for the following simple
> > patch. I've run into two types of compilation errors on
> > powerpc-ibm-aix (no htolen
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:58:51AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> IMHO you'd be best to write your own helpers for conversion to little
> endian (and back).
> gcc configure already has AC_C_BIGENDIAN (dunno how it handles pdp endian
> host though, so not sure if it is safe to rely on that), for rece
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:49:12AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> bootstrapping on i686-linux revealed the need for the following simple
> patch. I've run into two types of compilation errors on
> powerpc-ibm-aix (no htolenn functions and ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL
> somehow expanding to undeclare
Hi,
bootstrapping on i686-linux revealed the need for the following simple
patch. I've run into two types of compilation errors on
powerpc-ibm-aix (no htolenn functions and ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL
somehow expanding to undeclared rs6000_xcoff_strip_dollar). I plan to
workaround them quickly b
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:08:14PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> We don't error, apart from issuing a warning we basically ignore them.
> I believe we can do it even in the long term and that it is in fact
> useful because the standard says that the "effect" if these routines
> is "unspecified" if
Hi,
thanks Jakub. Below you'll find a patch, which is mostly work of
Martin Liska, that should address all the review comments. We have
then also went over the "XXX" marks (my bad that I forgot that Michael
uses this mark), removed half of them and turned the rest into TODOs.
Let me just quickl
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:39:34PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> +struct function_linkage_pair
> +{
> + function_linkage_pair (tree decl, unsigned int off):
I would have expected a space before :, or better yet on the next line:
function_linkage_pair (tree decl, unsigned int off)
: function
