>> I'd suggest adding an alias for "-no-pie" (meaning "--no-pie") -- see
>> earlier in common.opt where "-pie" is declared as an alias for "pie",
>> and similarly for "-shared".
>
> Patch Updated.
OK for google/gcc-4_9 branch. Thanks!
-cary
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
If adding a new option, you need to document it in invoke.texi.
>>>
>>> Patch updated.
>>
>> Is this alright for google/gcc-4_9?
>
> +no-pie
> +Driver RejectNegative Negative(pie)
> +Create a position dependent executable
>
> I'd suggest add
>>> If adding a new option, you need to document it in invoke.texi.
>>
>> Patch updated.
>
> Is this alright for google/gcc-4_9?
+no-pie
+Driver RejectNegative Negative(pie)
+Create a position dependent executable
I'd suggest adding an alias for "-no-pie" (meaning "--no-pie") -- see
earlier in co
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
>> If adding a new option, you need to document it in invoke.texi.
>
> Patch updated.
Is this alright for google/gcc-4_9?
Sri
>
> Thanks
> Sri
>
>>
>> --
>> Joseph S. Myers
>> jos
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> If adding a new option, you need to document it in invoke.texi.
Patch updated.
Thanks
Sri
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> jos...@codesourcery.com
Add a negative for option -pie: -no-pie builds a position dependent executable.
Note that -no-pie
If adding a new option, you need to document it in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Hi,
A build tool we are using adds -pie by default and I am adding
-no-pie to override this when necessary.
Is this patch alright? Would this be suitable for trunk?
Thanks
Sri
Add a negative for option -pie: -no-pie builds a position dependent executable.
Note that -no-pie also negates a pri
