Hi!
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:10:15 +0100, I wrote:
> $ gcc -m64 -Wall -Wextra -shared -o libgomp-plugin-host.so.1
> [...]/libgomp/plugin-host.c -fPIC -O -DDEBUG
>
> ..., and then set LIBGOMP_PLUGIN_PATH=$PWD in the environment.
If putting plugins for several architectures into the same direct
Hi!
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:59:59 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:49:20PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > 2014-02-19 20:10 GMT+04:00 Thomas Schwinge :
> > > Here is such a libgomp plugin plus the infrastructure for initial support
> > > of non-shared memory host execution.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:49:20PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2014-02-19 20:10 GMT+04:00 Thomas Schwinge :
> > Here is such a libgomp plugin plus the infrastructure for initial support
> > of non-shared memory host execution. Any comments?
> >
> > Grüße,
> > Thomas
>
> This plugin looks good.
>
2014-02-19 20:10 GMT+04:00 Thomas Schwinge :
> Here is such a libgomp plugin plus the infrastructure for initial support
> of non-shared memory host execution. Any comments?
>
> Grüße,
> Thomas
This plugin looks good.
I think the function call in GOMP_target also should be replaced with
a call
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:31:40 +0100, I wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:40:00 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > [...], device 257 is just a temporary testing hack, [...]
>
> > [...], once we have at least one supported offloading target,
> > hopefully we'll nuke device 257.
>
> Hmm, in contrast,
