On 10/20/2014 01:26 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 01:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> See how private or for clauses are handled earlier, you should
>> not need to parse identifier to handle RID_DELETE as
>> PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_DELETE.
>
> I forgot about private being a keyword in c++
On 10/20/2014 01:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:12:08PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> The OpenACC delete clause isn't detected in the c++ front end because
>> the lexer classifies it as a keyword, which it is. This patch makes the
>> openacc pragma parser aware of tha
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:12:08PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> The OpenACC delete clause isn't detected in the c++ front end because
> the lexer classifies it as a keyword, which it is. This patch makes the
> openacc pragma parser aware of that.
>
> I've committed this patch to gomp-4_0-bran
The OpenACC delete clause isn't detected in the c++ front end because
the lexer classifies it as a keyword, which it is. This patch makes the
openacc pragma parser aware of that.
I've committed this patch to gomp-4_0-branch. A test case will be
included in a follow up patch along with support for