On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> > And then, I don't specifically have a problem with discontinuing CUDA 5.5
> > support, and require 6.5, for example, but that should be a conscious
> > decision.
>
> We should probably ditch CUDA 5.5. In fact, according to trunk's cuda.h,
> it requ
On 02/15/2017 01:29 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:58:39 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> @@ -952,25 +958,30 @@ nvptx_exec (void (*fn), size_t mapnum, void
>> **hostaddrs, void **devaddrs,
>>CUdevice dev = nvptx_thread()->ptx_dev->dev;
>>/* 32 is the def
Hi Cesar!
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:58:39 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> This patch does the followings:
>
> * Adjusts the default num_gangs to utilize more of GPU hardware.
> * Teach libgomp to emit a diagnostic when num_workers isn't supported.
>
> [...]
Thanks!
> This patch has been app
This patch does the followings:
* Adjusts the default num_gangs to utilize more of GPU hardware.
* Teach libgomp to emit a diagnostic when num_workers isn't supported.
According to the confusing CUDA literature, it appears that the previous
num_gangs wasn't fully utilizing the GPU hardware. The
