Hi Cesar!
(At least several of) the issues that I pointed out (see below) have
never been fixed on gomp-4_0-branch, but the test cases have now been
merged from gomp-4_0-branch into trunk, so the regression (PASS -> FAIL
for libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-2.c) as well as the other
"oddities"
Hi!
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:56:44 +0200, I wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:11:25 +0200, I wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:13:59 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > wrote:
> > > This patch updates the libgomp OpenACC reduction test cases [...]
> > Given the following
> > -Wuninitialized/-Wmaybe-uninit
Hi!
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:11:25 +0200, I wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:13:59 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
> > This patch updates the libgomp OpenACC reduction test cases [...]
>
> > --- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/reduction-5.f90
> > +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-for
Hi Cesar!
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:13:59 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> This patch updates the libgomp OpenACC reduction test cases to check
> worker, vector and combined gang worker vector reductions. I tried to
> use some macros to simplify the c test cases a bit. I probably could
> have made
Hi Cesar!
Great progress with your OpenACC reductions work!
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:13:59 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> This patch updates the libgomp OpenACC reduction test cases [...]
> --- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/reduction-5.f90
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-for
This patch updates the libgomp OpenACC reduction test cases to check
worker, vector and combined gang worker vector reductions. I tried to
use some macros to simplify the c test cases a bit. I probably could
have made them more generic with an additional header file/macro, but
then that makes it to