On 07/28/15 08:30, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I do agree that a copy clause is wrong (expected to fail at runtime), but
why do you say an implicit copy clause is created? OpenACC 2.0a, 2.5.1
Parallel Construct, says that ยป[...] An array or variable of aggregate
data type referenced in the parallel
Hi Nathan!
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:19:17 -0400, Nathan Sidwell
wrote:
> On 07/28/15 06:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:02:01 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> >> I've committed this to gomp4 branch. It fixes some tests that were
> >> incorrect
> >
> > Hmm, I fail to see what
On 07/28/15 06:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Nathan!
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:02:01 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I've committed this to gomp4 branch. It fixes some tests that were incorrect
Hmm, I fail to see what you deem incorrect in the following two Fortran
test cases? Implicit present_o
Hi Nathan!
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:02:01 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've committed this to gomp4 branch. It fixes some tests that were incorrect
Hmm, I fail to see what you deem incorrect in the following two Fortran
test cases? Implicit present_or_copy clauses should be added by the
compi
I've committed this to gomp4 branch. It fixes some tests that were incorrect
and fail with some development I am working on.
nathan
2015-07-25 Nathan Sidwell
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-2.c: Copy lresult,
not result for logical reductions.
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c
