RE: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus <#pragma simd>

2013-05-21 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message- > From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:14 AM > To: Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek > Subject: Re: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus <#pragma simd> > > On 05/20/13 14:34, I

Re: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus <#pragma simd>

2013-05-21 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 05/20/13 14:34, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Hello Aldy, I have moved a couple prototypes from c-tree.h to c-family/c-common.h. This way I can use the same function for the C++ implementation. Here is a patch. OK for branch.

RE: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus <#pragma simd>

2013-05-20 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
t: Monday, May 13, 2013 8:17 PM > To: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek > Cc: Iyer, Balaji V > Subject: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus <#pragma simd> > > Hi Jakub. Hi folks. > > Attached is a patch against the gomp4 branch implementing Cilk's <#pragma > si

[gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus <#pragma simd>

2013-05-13 Thread Aldy Hernandez
Hi Jakub. Hi folks. Attached is a patch against the gomp4 branch implementing Cilk's <#pragma simd> construct with the gomp4 infrastructure. I emit OMP_SIMD as previously mentioned, and let omp-low.c do the rest. The reason for this, is that Cilk Plus and OMP4 behave pretty much the same w