On Sun, 18 Dec 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> The attached patch attempts to reject invalid pass-name in startwith
> and verified gimplefe tests pass with the patch (not sure if bootstrap
> is required?)
> Does it look OK ?
No - get_pass_by_name works on dump file names while th
The message passed to error_at should not end in \n; the diagnostics
machinery deals with inserting the newline.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On 18 December 2016 at 18:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:41:23PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
>> +++ b/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
>> @@ -1046,6 +1046,17 @@ c_parser_gimple_pass_list (c_parser *parser)
>>if (! c_parser_require (parser, CPP_C
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:41:23PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> --- a/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
> +++ b/gcc/c/gimple-parser.c
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,17 @@ c_parser_gimple_pass_list (c_parser *parser)
>if (! c_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, "expected %<)%>"))
> return NULL;
>
> +
Hi Richard,
The attached patch attempts to reject invalid pass-name in startwith
and verified gimplefe tests pass with the patch (not sure if bootstrap
is required?)
Does it look OK ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2016-12-18 Prathamesh Kulkarni
c/
* gimple-parser.c (c_parser_gimple_pass_list): Re
