Re: [gcc patch 1/3] cp-demangle.c: Make `options' a parameter

2011-06-13 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:06:21 +0200, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > The new options parameter should be the second parameter, not the last. OK, I agree. > This is OK with those changes. Checked in. Thanks, Jan http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=174999 --- trunk/libiberty/ChangeLog

Re: [gcc patch 1/3] cp-demangle.c: Make `options' a parameter

2011-06-13 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > libiberty/ > 2011-05-24  Jan Kratochvil   > >        * cp-demangle.c (struct d_print_info): Remove field options. >        (d_print_init): Remove parameter options. >        (cplus_demangle_print_callback): Update all the callers. >        

[gcc patch 1/3] cp-demangle.c: Make `options' a parameter

2011-06-02 Thread Jan Kratochvil
Hi, this patch makes no functionality change, it only reshuffles the code. After printing the toplevel function type we want to disable DMGL_RET_POSTFIX for any inner types. Without such DMGL_RET_POSTFIX disabling for inner types the new testcase would: FAIL at line 3973, options --format=gnu-v