Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic

2011-03-12 Thread FX
> I am mostly OK, however: > > function > -@cindex logarithmic > +@cindex base 10 logarithm function > > I think even when looking for the decadic logarithm (common logarithm), I > would look under "L" for logarithm and not under "B" for "base". How about > "logarithm function with base 10"? If

Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic

2011-03-12 Thread Tobias Burnus
Am 12.03.2011 10:52, schrieb FX: The attached patch clarifies the documentation of the LOG intrinsic by stating explicitly that it's the natural log function. Tested with "make info html pdf", OK to commit to trun I am mostly OK, however: function -@cindex logarithmic +@cindex base 10 logari

[fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic

2011-03-12 Thread FX
The attached patch clarifies the documentation of the LOG intrinsic by stating explicitly that it's the natural log function. Tested with "make info html pdf", OK to commit to trunk? FX log_doc.ChangeLog Description: Binary data log_doc.diff Description: Binary data