I missed the patch because the thread got too long. Also, I trust you
after all these years. :)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>>>Ok for mainline now and the backports after some soak time?
>>
>> Yes, the libstdc++ parts are OK, thanks.
>
> I assume Bruce is
Hi Jonathan,
>>Ok for mainline now and the backports after some soak time?
>
> Yes, the libstdc++ parts are OK, thanks.
I assume Bruce is ok with the change to the hpux11_fabsf fix given that it
was suggested by the HP-UX maintainer and fixes fixincludes make check ;-)
Rainer
--
--
On 18/11/16 12:10 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
The change is OK in principle, but I'd prefer more meaningful names
for the macros ...
Fine with me: I know close to nothing of C++, so please bear with me ;-)
No problem, that's what the rest of us are here to help with :-)
I don't mind whether y
Hi Jonathan,
> On 03/11/16 15:11 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>Fortunately, this is all easily fixed by wrapping the affected templates
>>in a new macro. That's what this patch does. The new libstdc++
>>acinclude.m4 test may well need wording changes in comments etc. and can
>>perhaps be shortened
On 03/11/16 15:11 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
Fortunately, this is all easily fixed by wrapping the affected templates
in a new macro. That's what this patch does. The new libstdc++
acinclude.m4 test may well need wording changes in comments etc. and can
perhaps be shortened a bit, bit it worked
Hi Bruce,
> On 11/03/16 07:11, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>
>> Ok for mainline now, and for backports to the gcc-6 and gcc-5 branches
>> after some soak time?
>
> Yes, please. Thanks.
unfortunately, I didn't look closly enough when checking for failures.
There is one which I thought was preexisting:
m
On 11/03/16 07:11, Rainer Orth wrote:
Ok for mainline now, and for backports to the gcc-6 and gcc-5 branches
after some soak time?
Yes, please. Thanks.
As I've noticed some time ago, recent versions of Solaris
include this little gem:
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
#undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH
#undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1
#endif
This renders a couple of perfectly good libstdc++ tests as UNSUPPORTED
and is completely unsustainable. Agreement
