On 12/11/18 9:41 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 12/5/18 10:14 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/4/18 8:49 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
What is the "it" referenced in the user's questions you quoted? The
const/pure attributes? Those are function attributes. The text you
are adding is in the type
On 12/5/18 10:14 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/4/18 8:49 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
What is the "it" referenced in the user's questions you quoted? The
const/pure attributes? Those are function attributes. The text you
are adding is in the type attribute section, so it seemed like it was
On 12/4/18 8:49 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 12/4/18 8:13 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/4/18 2:04 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 12/4/18 9:26 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
[snip]
+The keyword @code{__attribute__} allows you to specify various special
+properties of types. Some type attributes a
On 12/4/18 8:13 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/4/18 2:04 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 12/4/18 9:26 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
[snip]
+The keyword @code{__attribute__} allows you to specify various special
+properties of types. Some type attributes apply only to structure and
+union types, and
On 12/4/18 2:04 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 12/4/18 9:26 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Thanks for the comments. Attached is an updated patch with
the typos fixed. I've left the rest as is.
Well, I still think a number of points I commented on before need to be
clarified in the text. If I'm c
On 12/4/18 9:26 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Thanks for the comments. Attached is an updated patch with
the typos fixed. I've left the rest as is.
Well, I still think a number of points I commented on before need to be
clarified in the text. If I'm confused, I think other readers will be,
too,
On 12/4/18 12:09 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 12/3/18 4:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/extend.texi (attribute const, pure): Clarify.
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 26676
On 12/3/18 4:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/extend.texi (attribute const, pure): Clarify.
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 266766)
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi (working copy)
@@
In a recent discussion a user asked us to clarify the effects
of attributes const and pure on member functoons of trivial
structs vs. non-trivial classes, and functions with pointer
vs. reference arguments.
I think this is worth explaining in some general statement
rather than for individual attr
