On 11 November 2012 09:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I'd use http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/select.html
>
> Thanks, Jonathan. I committed the patch below.
Great, thanks.
>> Are you sure the other links haven't already been fi
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'd use http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/select.html
Thanks, Jonathan. I committed the patch below.
> Are you sure the other links haven't already been fixed in the
> libstdc++ sources?
>
> The copies on the website are usual
On 5 November 2012 00:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Are you sure the other links haven't already been fixed in the
> libstdc++ sources?
>
> The copies on the website are usually fairly out of date.
Yes, looking at doc/xml/manual/policy_data_structures.xml it seems
that the dinkumware reference is
On 4 November 2012 20:36, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/pb_ds/acks.html
>>> - http://starship.python.net/crew/aaron_watters/kjbuckets/
>>>broken links
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/pb_ds
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/pb_ds/acks.html
>>> - http://starship.python.net/crew/aaron_watters/kjbuckets/
>>>broken links
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/pb_ds/acks.html
>> - http://starship.python.net/crew/aaron_watters/kjbuckets/
>>broken links
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/pb_ds/references.html
>> - http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/
On 2 November 2012 01:01, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
>>> pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
>>> one?
>> They're imported, do we really want to tweak them? And then
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
>> pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
>> one?
> They're imported, do we really want to tweak them? And then tweak them
> again next time we import them?
>
> If
On 2 November 2012 00:29, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
> pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
> one?
They're imported, do we really want to tweak them? And then tweak them
again next time we import them?
If the
So that the libstdc++ guys cannot complain I am only spending time
on Java. ;-)
There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
one?
Applied.
Gerald
2012-11-02 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/xml/manual/codecvt.xml:
10 matches
Mail list logo