On 10/26/2011 08:29 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
and new generic routines are provided as follows:
void __atomic_load (T* object, T* return_value, memory_order m)
void __atomic_store (T* object, T* new_value, memory_order m)
void __atomic_exchange (T*
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> and new generic routines are provided as follows:
>
> void __atomic_load (T* object, T* return_value, memory_order m)
> void __atomic_store (T* object, T* new_value, memory_order m)
> void __atomic_exchange (T* object, T* new_value, T* return_valu
On 10/25/2011 12:12 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> OK, how's this. (just the c-common.c file)
>
> It seems to work fine. Past all the basic tests, and bootstraps in an
> incremental bootstrap. I'll kick off a full scratch bootstrap/test before
> feeling all warm and fuzzy tho :-)
Looks good.
r
On 10/25/2011 02:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/25/2011 10:20 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
+ /* Otherwise there is a lockfree match, transform the call from:
+void fn(T* mem, T* desired, T* return, model)
+ into
+*((In *)return = fn (T* mem, *((In *)desired, model) */
On 10/25/2011 10:20 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> + /* Otherwise there is a lockfree match, transform the call from:
> +void fn(T* mem, T* desired, T* return, model)
> + into
> +*((In *)return = fn (T* mem, *((In *)desired, model) */
This is, in general, an aliasing violation
