Re: [committed] testsuite: Fix up atomic-inst-ldlogic.c

2025-04-05 Thread Sam James
Jakub Jelinek writes: > Hi! > > r15-8956 changed in the test: > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */ > which made it even worse than before, when the directive has > been silently ignored because it didn't match the regex

[committed] testsuite: Fix up atomic-inst-ldlogic.c

2025-04-04 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! r15-8956 changed in the test: -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */ which made it even worse than before, when the directive has been silently ignored because it didn't match the regex for directives. Now it matches it b

Re: [committed] testsuite: Fix up atomic-inst-ldlogic.c

2025-03-30 Thread Sam James
Christophe Lyon writes: > Le dim. 30 mars 2025, 22:10, Sam James a écrit : > > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > > Hi! > > > > r15-8956 changed in the test: > > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */ > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */ > > which made it ev

Re: [committed] testsuite: Fix up atomic-inst-ldlogic.c

2025-03-30 Thread Christophe Lyon
Le dim. 30 mars 2025, 22:10, Sam James a écrit : > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > > Hi! > > > > r15-8956 changed in the test: > > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */ > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */ > > which made it even worse than before, when the direc