Jakub Jelinek writes:
> Hi!
>
> r15-8956 changed in the test:
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */
> which made it even worse than before, when the directive has
> been silently ignored because it didn't match the regex
Hi!
r15-8956 changed in the test:
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */
which made it even worse than before, when the directive has
been silently ignored because it didn't match the regex for
directives. Now it matches it b
Christophe Lyon writes:
> Le dim. 30 mars 2025, 22:10, Sam James a écrit :
>
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > r15-8956 changed in the test:
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */
> > which made it ev
Le dim. 30 mars 2025, 22:10, Sam James a écrit :
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > r15-8956 changed in the test:
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16} */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldclr\t" 16 } */
> > which made it even worse than before, when the direc