On 3/20/24 11:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:58:05AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 3/20/24 10:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Like for x86-64, alpha or rs6000, m32r seems to be affected too.
Just visually checked differences in c23-stdarg-9.c assembly in a cross
without/with
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:58:05AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 3/20/24 10:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Like for x86-64, alpha or rs6000, m32r seems to be affected too.
> >
> > Just visually checked differences in c23-stdarg-9.c assembly in a cross
> > without/with the patch, committed to trunk.
On 3/20/24 10:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
Like for x86-64, alpha or rs6000, m32r seems to be affected too.
Just visually checked differences in c23-stdarg-9.c assembly in a cross
without/with the patch, committed to trunk.
That fixed c23-stdarg-{6,8,9} execution tests.
jeff
Hi!
Like for x86-64, alpha or rs6000, m32r seems to be affected too.
Just visually checked differences in c23-stdarg-9.c assembly in a cross
without/with the patch, committed to trunk.
2024-03-20 Jakub Jelinek
PR target/114175
* config/m32r/m32r.cc (m32r_setup_incoming_vararg