On 26/10/20 08:07 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 21/10/2020 22:14, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
The _M_add_ref_lock() and _M_add_ref_lock_nothrow() members of
_Sp_counted_base are very similar, except that the former throws an
exception when the use count is zero and the latter retu
On 21/10/2020 22:14, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
The _M_add_ref_lock() and _M_add_ref_lock_nothrow() members of
_Sp_counted_base are very similar, except that the former throws an
exception when the use count is zero and the latter returns false. The
former (and its callers) can be imp
The _M_add_ref_lock() and _M_add_ref_lock_nothrow() members of
_Sp_counted_base are very similar, except that the former throws an
exception when the use count is zero and the latter returns false. The
former (and its callers) can be implemented in terms of the latter.
This results in a small reduc
