Re: [committed] libstdc++: Reuse double overload of __convert_to_v if possible

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 00:20, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:32:29 +0100 > > From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches > > > Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk. > > Does the below typo imply that for x86_64-linux, > "__DBL_MANT_DIG__ == __LDBL_MANT_DIG__" is false and the

Re: [committed] libstdc++: Reuse double overload of __convert_to_v if possible

> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:32:29 +0100 > From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches > Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk. Does the below typo imply that for x86_64-linux, "__DBL_MANT_DIG__ == __LDBL_MANT_DIG__" is false and the code is actually untested? > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * con

[committed] libstdc++: Reuse double overload of __convert_to_v if possible

Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk. -- >8 -- For targets where double and long double have the same representation we can reuse the same __convert_to_v code for both types. This will slightly reduce the size of the compiled code in the library. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * config/locale/