On 29/10/20 14:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This change allows std::function::target() to work even without RTTI,
using the same approach as std::any. Because we know what the manager
function would be for a given type, we can check if the stored pointer
has the expected address. If it does,
On 29/10/20 14:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This change allows std::function::target() to work even without RTTI,
using the same approach as std::any. Because we know what the manager
function would be for a given type, we can check if the stored pointer
has the expected address. If it does,
This change allows std::function::target() to work even without RTTI,
using the same approach as std::any. Because we know what the manager
function would be for a given type, we can check if the stored pointer
has the expected address. If it does, we don't need to use RTTI. If it
isn't equal, we s
This change allows std::function::target() to work even without RTTI,
using the same approach as std::any. Because we know what the manager
function would be for a given type, we can check if the stored pointer
has the expected address. If it does, we don't need to use RTTI. If it
isn't equal, we s
