On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 22:11, Tim Song wrote:
>
> That example violates http://eel.is/c++draft/unique.ptr.runtime.general#3
Even though it's undefined I committed a workaround to allow it,
because it breaks LLVM:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2021-June/052851.html
(I forgot to send that
That example violates http://eel.is/c++draft/unique.ptr.runtime.general#3
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:55 PM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
>
> > The LWG issue proposes to add a conditional noexcept-specifier to
> > std::unique_p
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 19:54, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
>
> > The LWG issue proposes to add a conditional noexcept-specifier to
> > std::unique_ptr's dereference operator. The issue is currently in
> > Tentatively Ready status, but even if i
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
> The LWG issue proposes to add a conditional noexcept-specifier to
> std::unique_ptr's dereference operator. The issue is currently in
> Tentatively Ready status, but even if it isn't voted into the draft, we
> can do it as a conforming ex
The LWG issue proposes to add a conditional noexcept-specifier to
std::unique_ptr's dereference operator. The issue is currently in
Tentatively Ready status, but even if it isn't voted into the draft, we
can do it as a conforming extensions. This commit also adds a similar
noexcept-specifier to ope
