On 6-Apr-14, at 12:51 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 9:23 AM, John David Anglin
wrote:
This test is an expected fail on hppa*-*-hpux* because there is no
lockless atomic support.
One can add “no lockless atomic” in there somewhere… The reason is
that a secondary port that some
On Apr 6, 2014, at 9:23 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> This test is an expected fail on hppa*-*-hpux* because there is no lockless
> atomic support.
One can add “no lockless atomic” in there somewhere… The reason is that a
secondary port that someone is doing can see a failure, look at the tes
This test is an expected fail on hppa*-*-hpux* because there is no
lockless atomic support.
Tested on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Committed to trunk.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2014-04-06 John David Anglin
* gcc.dg/atomic/stdatomic-fl
