On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> (That makes it all the more puzzling how the issue you fixed last
>> week did not arise, Jonathan.)
> It didn't give a 404, there was a page at the end of the link, just
> an empty one. So it probably looks like a good link to your script.
Yes, as lo
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 00:43 Jonathan Wakely, wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, 23:28 Gerald Pfeifer, wrote:
>
>> It turns out my link checker does catch broken links under
>> gcc.gnu.org/install/ - fixed thusly.
>>
>> (That makes it all the more puzzling how the issue you fixed last
>> week did n
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, 23:28 Gerald Pfeifer, wrote:
> It turns out my link checker does catch broken links under
> gcc.gnu.org/install/ - fixed thusly.
>
> (That makes it all the more puzzling how the issue you fixed last
> week did not arise, Jonathan.)
>
It didn't give a 404, there was a page at
It turns out my link checker does catch broken links under
gcc.gnu.org/install/ - fixed thusly.
(That makes it all the more puzzling how the issue you fixed last
week did not arise, Jonathan.)
Gerald
gcc:
* doc/install.texi (Binaries): Convert mingw-w64.org to https.
(Specific)
