Re: [committed] d: Increase max parallelism of the D testsuite

2025-02-28 Thread Lewis Hyatt
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 5:11 AM Iain Buclaw wrote: > > Excerpts from Lewis Hyatt's message of Februar 26, 2025 2:04 am: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:00 PM Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> It was noticed that when running the testsuite for gdc and libphobos in > >> parallel, this was c

Re: [committed] d: Increase max parallelism of the D testsuite

2025-02-27 Thread Iain Buclaw
Excerpts from Lewis Hyatt's message of Februar 26, 2025 2:04 am: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:00 PM Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It was noticed that when running the testsuite for gdc and libphobos in >> parallel, this was capped at 10 simultaneous jobs each. Increase this >> limit to 128,

Re: [committed] d: Increase max parallelism of the D testsuite

2025-02-25 Thread Lewis Hyatt
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:00 PM Iain Buclaw wrote: > > Hi, > > It was noticed that when running the testsuite for gdc and libphobos in > parallel, this was capped at 10 simultaneous jobs each. Increase this > limit to 128, which enables running for example `make check-d -j48` to > complete in ha

[committed] d: Increase max parallelism of the D testsuite

2025-02-25 Thread Iain Buclaw
Hi, It was noticed that when running the testsuite for gdc and libphobos in parallel, this was capped at 10 simultaneous jobs each. Increase this limit to 128, which enables running for example `make check-d -j48` to complete in half the time. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-g